<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Maybe. If you can predict the in Product Forum</title>
    <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/How-to-overcome-quot-more-than-one-matching-quot-error-to/m-p/55795#M10083</link>
    <description>Maybe. If you can predict the attributes of the attributes of the elements that could appear, then you have a chance. Let's say there are 10 possible fields and they are called Field1, Field2....If you are able to add each filed to the application model, then you could use a wait stage to tell you if each one is present, either with CheckExist=False or through the timeout. 
But this all depends on the target application and whether the attributes of the elements follow a pattern. You need to be able to anticipate how the application will work</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John__Carter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-17T19:10:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to overcome "more than one matching" error to utilize all of the matched fields?</title>
      <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/How-to-overcome-quot-more-than-one-matching-quot-error-to/m-p/55792#M10080</link>
      <description>Hello,

In some part of the process, I need to give inputs to the boxes which I don't know how many of them will appear on screen.

I tried to use wildcard matching for some attributes, and it worked for identifying; however the system gives "more than one matching" error.

How could I proceed? Any help appreciated</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/How-to-overcome-quot-more-than-one-matching-quot-error-to/m-p/55792#M10080</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ugur_KadirYıldı</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T16:19:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ideally you need to find a</title>
      <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/How-to-overcome-quot-more-than-one-matching-quot-error-to/m-p/55793#M10081</link>
      <description>Ideally you need to find a combination of attributes unique to each element. Sometimes Ordinal can help, but not always. Physical coordinates/dimensions can be used, but the risk is they do not remain constant. Also research Match Index and Match Reverse.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/How-to-overcome-quot-more-than-one-matching-quot-error-to/m-p/55793#M10081</guid>
      <dc:creator>John__Carter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T16:39:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks John.</title>
      <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/How-to-overcome-quot-more-than-one-matching-quot-error-to/m-p/55794#M10082</link>
      <description>Thanks John. 
The problem is not about differentiating fields. Actually the fields are differentiable but they could be any number and I could not how many fields there will be. 
Is there a way to identify them with some kind of logic?
Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/How-to-overcome-quot-more-than-one-matching-quot-error-to/m-p/55794#M10082</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ugur_KadirYıldı</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T16:47:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Maybe. If you can predict the</title>
      <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/How-to-overcome-quot-more-than-one-matching-quot-error-to/m-p/55795#M10083</link>
      <description>Maybe. If you can predict the attributes of the attributes of the elements that could appear, then you have a chance. Let's say there are 10 possible fields and they are called Field1, Field2....If you are able to add each filed to the application model, then you could use a wait stage to tell you if each one is present, either with CheckExist=False or through the timeout. 
But this all depends on the target application and whether the attributes of the elements follow a pattern. You need to be able to anticipate how the application will work</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/How-to-overcome-quot-more-than-one-matching-quot-error-to/m-p/55795#M10083</guid>
      <dc:creator>John__Carter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T19:10:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

