<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why BP is not consistently adding new VBOs? in Product Forum</title>
    <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Why-BP-is-not-consistently-adding-new-VBOs/m-p/65028#M17705</link>
    <description>Why BP is not consistently providing/adding new VBOs? If they are,&amp;nbsp;please point me to it.

With the Object-approach of BP, it is basically not that difficult to add an object which essentially can be considered as additional features. If BP is constantly creating and providing new/updated VBOs for general use, that will feel like additional features are added.

Most will probably say that because every application and the process requirement is different. However, I can see some scenarios where additional VBOs will be beneficial in general.

For example, I know that we have Utility - Strings. But of course, there are quite a lot that can still be added to it. There are quite a lot of String manipulation scenarios. Same goes with Collections.

Another example - support for Silverlight with Windowless=true. Other vendor provide some extension to be able to work with Silverlight even if Windowless=true. I imagine in BP, this could be possible (or not) by utilizing some DLL files and of course a&amp;nbsp;specific VBO.

Those things mentioned are just examples - might not be the best ones but you get the point.

Looking forward to hear what you think about this. Thanks!

&amp;nbsp;

-rang1</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RonAng</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-26T05:44:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why BP is not consistently adding new VBOs?</title>
      <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Why-BP-is-not-consistently-adding-new-VBOs/m-p/65028#M17705</link>
      <description>Why BP is not consistently providing/adding new VBOs? If they are,&amp;nbsp;please point me to it.

With the Object-approach of BP, it is basically not that difficult to add an object which essentially can be considered as additional features. If BP is constantly creating and providing new/updated VBOs for general use, that will feel like additional features are added.

Most will probably say that because every application and the process requirement is different. However, I can see some scenarios where additional VBOs will be beneficial in general.

For example, I know that we have Utility - Strings. But of course, there are quite a lot that can still be added to it. There are quite a lot of String manipulation scenarios. Same goes with Collections.

Another example - support for Silverlight with Windowless=true. Other vendor provide some extension to be able to work with Silverlight even if Windowless=true. I imagine in BP, this could be possible (or not) by utilizing some DLL files and of course a&amp;nbsp;specific VBO.

Those things mentioned are just examples - might not be the best ones but you get the point.

Looking forward to hear what you think about this. Thanks!

&amp;nbsp;

-rang1</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Why-BP-is-not-consistently-adding-new-VBOs/m-p/65028#M17705</guid>
      <dc:creator>RonAng</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-26T05:44:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

