<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: Modifying BPAuditEvents Archiving Script in Product Forum</title>
    <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Modifying-BPAuditEvents-Archiving-Script/m-p/45907#M2018</link>
    <description>Hi Max - please ask advice from our support team, but I guess it would be a case of adding a condition to exclude the 'user x modified process y' rows.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;John Carter&lt;BR /&gt;Professional Services&lt;BR /&gt;Blue Prism&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John__Carter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-03-25T10:19:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Modifying BPAuditEvents Archiving Script</title>
      <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Modifying-BPAuditEvents-Archiving-Script/m-p/45906#M2017</link>
      <description>​Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am trying to work out the best way to manage the BPAuditEvents table in Blue Prism. We currently have a policy to delete anything &amp;gt; 6 months old via the trim-process-history.sql query. The problem with this is that process/object versions are deleted.&lt;BR /&gt;What I want to do is to ensure there is at least 1 historical version of a process/object at all times as it's important for our release manager to be able to compare to a previous version when importing.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Has anyone been able to modify the script or has an alternative way to manage this?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any assistance would be appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Max McConchie&lt;BR /&gt;Automation Manager&lt;BR /&gt;Australian Government Department of Finance&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2020 02:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Modifying-BPAuditEvents-Archiving-Script/m-p/45906#M2017</guid>
      <dc:creator>MaxMcConchie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-25T02:29:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Modifying BPAuditEvents Archiving Script</title>
      <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Modifying-BPAuditEvents-Archiving-Script/m-p/45907#M2018</link>
      <description>Hi Max - please ask advice from our support team, but I guess it would be a case of adding a condition to exclude the 'user x modified process y' rows.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;John Carter&lt;BR /&gt;Professional Services&lt;BR /&gt;Blue Prism&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Modifying-BPAuditEvents-Archiving-Script/m-p/45907#M2018</guid>
      <dc:creator>John__Carter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-25T10:19:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

