<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Using multiple range conditions for X and Y attributes to identify an element (AA or WIN32 spying method) in Product Forum</title>
    <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Using-multiple-range-conditions-for-X-and-Y-attributes-to/m-p/70250#M22855</link>
    <description>Is there a round about way to use two&amp;nbsp;ranges (i.e 100 &amp;lt; Y &amp;lt; 200) when identifying an element? The existing match types only have a single range condition (i.e. greater than, less than, equals etc).

&amp;nbsp;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-13T10:35:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using multiple range conditions for X and Y attributes to identify an element (AA or WIN32 spying method)</title>
      <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Using-multiple-range-conditions-for-X-and-Y-attributes-to/m-p/70250#M22855</link>
      <description>Is there a round about way to use two&amp;nbsp;ranges (i.e 100 &amp;lt; Y &amp;lt; 200) when identifying an element? The existing match types only have a single range condition (i.e. greater than, less than, equals etc).

&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Using-multiple-range-conditions-for-X-and-Y-attributes-to/m-p/70250#M22855</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-13T10:35:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

