<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Code Approved indicator in Product Forum</title>
    <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Code-Approved-indicator/m-p/51130#M6245</link>
    <description>In my organization we have something called "code review" and we need to document that it was performed as it has become a control inside the company for safety measures. The way we chose to document is via a digitally signed e-mail for segregation of duties and application of 4-eyes principle. Although it would be really good to have a "right-click &amp;gt; approve version &amp;gt; *authentication&amp;nbsp;pop-up*" and have one of those signatures ribbons next to the approved version of the code identified by the user.&amp;nbsp;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 00:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GleydsonFerreir</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-02T00:45:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Code Approved indicator</title>
      <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Code-Approved-indicator/m-p/51130#M6245</link>
      <description>In my organization we have something called "code review" and we need to document that it was performed as it has become a control inside the company for safety measures. The way we chose to document is via a digitally signed e-mail for segregation of duties and application of 4-eyes principle. Although it would be really good to have a "right-click &amp;gt; approve version &amp;gt; *authentication&amp;nbsp;pop-up*" and have one of those signatures ribbons next to the approved version of the code identified by the user.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 00:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Code-Approved-indicator/m-p/51130#M6245</guid>
      <dc:creator>GleydsonFerreir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-02T00:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Second! The audit trails for…</title>
      <link>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Code-Approved-indicator/m-p/51131#M6246</link>
      <description>Second!&amp;nbsp;The audit trails for importing processes and objects are great, adding&amp;nbsp;logging of the sign-off from the&amp;nbsp;reviewer would be amazing. This would&amp;nbsp;remove any separate storage and tracking solutions for reviews being made, especially cumbersome when scaling up..</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.blueprism.com/t5/Product-Forum/Code-Approved-indicator/m-p/51131#M6246</guid>
      <dc:creator>joakimeklund</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-26T14:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

