✨Quick WorkHQ workflow design challenge!

[bweschke]

Building great workflows isn't just about knowing the tools, it's about choosing the right one. Our new course dives into the Code step for advanced data processing, business logic, transformations, and error handling, while also showing when native actions and Advanced Data Mapping are the smarter choice.

Check out our latest course for WorkHQ Blue Prism® WorkHQ: Using Code in Workflows

So here's today's question:

👉 True or False: "If a workflow can be built using native actions, you should still use the Code step because it's more powerful."

Let us know in the comments if it is True or False and share your reasoning.  We'd love to hear how you approach workflow design.

[rksr1]

False:

Native Actions First: These are built specifically for WorkHQ to ensure maintainability and readability and handling operations that does not require complex manipulations

Use Code stage efficiently: Code stages are definitely powerful and provide access to utilize JavaScript and Typescript. But these should be reserved for advanced data processing and complex logics where native actions falls short.

[naveed_raza]

False: 

Native action can do only basic , code stage will give freedom to do multiple steps in one go and also do complex calculations , specially on dataset and code stages runs very fast even if we lot of steps in code stage.

for basics i always use Native first , and for complex code stages