I believe that one of the early questions is incorrect. I'll put my description of it and the image below in a spoiler tag.
The way I read this then is that it's asking what the business object is doing for the process (even though it does say solution which is overall). The answer to that would be "by avoiding modeling and direct interactions with the application".
I think an easy fix to this would be to adjust the question/answers.
Instead, I think it should be like this, to avoid unclear pronoun reference:
What aspect of object design contributes to the efficiency of automation solutions?
1 - Limiting the object's interactions with the application
2 - Designing the object specifically for the client/business process
(correct) 3 - Absolving the object of the responsibility for business rules and decision making, enabling reuse and building a diverse object library
4 - Avoiding modeling in the object and direct interactions with the application
I recognize that this could simply be my fault for misreading a question, but I do think unclear pronounce reference is more likely the cause here.
In the section about Best Practices for Building a Process, it encourages people to put sensitive information into environment variables. This is incorrect. There is a password datatype for environment variables, but that does not make it a secure place to store sensitive information. Of course you can do it, but it frankly makes no sense to given that Credential Manager exists.
"Use environmental variables for sensitive information, such as usernames and passwords, instead of hardcoding them into the process."
I sure hope no one is actually doing this. You cannot restrict access to specific environment variables in any way. All processes and objects can access any environment variable.
What this should say instead is this:
"Use Blue Prism Credential Manager for sensitive information, such as usernames and passwords, instead of hardcoding them into the process."
