cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Anas
Staff
Staff
Status: Not Planned

White building a test suite that will be used for validation and for regression testing , it will be useful after running this test suite to have a kind of code coverage (or Process stages coverage)  informations.

This code coverage can provide us with statistics like:

·         % of items in the process we didn’t path through. (it will be a good coverage indicator)

·         A list of these Items so we can enrich our test and enhance our test coverage.

·         Number of times we passed in the same path or sequence, so we can optimize our test suite by reducing test without compromising quality.

·         Object and objects ’actions called during these tests.

·         Credentials not used, Queues not used, …

·         ….

This code coverage will also help identifying in production what objects are no more used and which paths in the processes we never go through in production.

1 Comment
Status changed to: Not Planned

Hello @Anas,

Thanks for taking the time to raise an idea.

Given the amount of time this idea has been open and given that it has not passed the required vote threshold to be considered for roadmap (current vote count is currently 6), I'm going to mark this idea as Not Planned. If the votes for this idea increase drastically we can revisit this, or alternatively if any other ideas for the same enhancement exist then votes from this idea can be merged into the alternate.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

 

Regards,

Rob