Hello! As a developer we get conditioned to save ALOT and typing a comment every time means a distraction from the thought-process. I understand this is due to the commits to the DB behind BP. A feature to Quicksave (ctrl+s) to temporarily save the changes locally without a comment would make developing alot smoother. That way you could test objects until they work the way you want them to, and then commit them to the DB. The same way most developer tools work these days. ... View more

Hello! As BluePrism works right now it is only possible to open a single properties-window. As swoon as you open one you immediately lock all windows that are open.  While developing it would be really useful to be able to open one properties-window per process/object-window. ... View more

There should be a way( may be a tile/dashboard) to see % of license used for past months also. this will help in doing the forecasting analysis for license. Currently what we can see is "at the moment" license usage in dashboard. ... View more

​A Dashboard which will be much easier to configure and use as the current one. And as a feature it would be really nice if you could display in a external confluence. So that everybody can see the values and not only the person, which have installed bp. ... View more

This is a issue which i faced a lot personally and i feel others for sure had. Getting a response to batch file is for sure a way around but it will be great if we can create some activity or something to have it as a output parameter from CMD. ... View more

Since developers should spend time to create Environment Variable descriptions in Control when they are defined (and/or updated) - it would be helpful if that definition was pulled into Data Item stages once the Environment Variable is selected in the Data Item stage. This would reduce the number of times developers must describe Environment Variables when a definition already exists in Control. The description could be carried in as editable text in case a developer wants to edit or augment the description if required to make their logic clearer. ... View more

I think it would be useful to be able to validate the schema of work queue items before they get added to a work queue. My thought is an XSD validation string or or some such mechanism could be associated with the work queue. The Add to Queue action could use it to validate that the data being added to the queue is valid before proceeding. The advantage of this is that processes that use the work queue would be able to safely assume that any data entered into the queue is valid. Further, it would mean that exceptions due to invalid data would happen at the time that data is being added to the queue, as opposed to when the data is being read from the queue. On a practical level, this may not happen often since users should be testing what data is being added into queues before going live with it. However, this would still be a gain because it would be one less thing that you have to think about while building processes. ... View more

With the current version of Capture we can only customize (under User Settings) for example company logo and colors. But is there a possibility to customize the Contents ? Right now when we are finished with the entire recording and want to download the PDD , it comes with a default set of Contents and it is tedious to change and adjust the headings and sub-headings according to the company standards and requirements. If we can set these headings and sub-headings prior to the download just like how we do with the Logo and color under user settings that will save a lot of time and energy.  Default Contents: Desired Contents: ... View more

Moving processes/objects from one group to another (given that we have hundreds of processes/objects), is the most painful process ! he original method, way back in v4?, where you moved them under Process/Object Management option on the System Menu, although not perfect, was much easier. It could really do with a bulk option too. ... View more

I would like to see a search box for data items . For ex in calc/ Decision stages. I am sure no one would like to scroll the whole list and expand the categories when you have hundreds of data items/ Collections in your process   ... View more

Hi everyone, As a best practice, we always add Wait-Check Exist right before Write,read or navigate action. If the wait stage timeouts, we throw an exception. Detail of this exception contains the element which is in Wait stage. It would be great, if there will be an "Element" variable (name of element/s as text or collection) to use in wait block. This feature will reduce development time. ... View more

Hi, It will be good to have MTE environment implemented for Process dependencies like, Work queues, Environment variables, credentials etc.., Currently it is applicable on Studio for groups and on Control room for differentiate runtime resources. Thanks, Manoj ... View more

Hello Folks,      I have a hard time determining which Page is currently being shown when inside a Process or Object in Studio. I recommend that we set the BG Color for the current Page (TAB) in stark contrast to the other Tabs so that it is easily obvious which Page is currently being displayed.                                      Thanks ... View more

​Hi Team, I would like to provide an idea on search feature for Process/Object in Studio.  When we work with larg amount of process and Objects, we need to scroll and search for particular Process or Objects in studio, which takes lot of time. If we have Search box in place for this in studio then we will achieve great User experience especially for customers with a large amount of Objects and Processes. Also it will have impact on development time. Also I would like to suggest Search feature for Action stage. When we work with action stage and if we are having large number of actions created in solution then we will have to scroll all actions in order to select one. If we have search functionality for the same then we will achieve great User experience especially for customers with a large amount of Objects and Processes. Also it will have impact on development time. I have attached screen shot for your reference. Thanks, Sagar ... View more

Currently the WSS-Username Token Authentication for outbound SOAP calls only allows the use of a plaintext password. This request is to enhance this capability to allow the encryption of passwords when using this method of authentication. ... View more

When hovering a Stage, some of its properties are shown. At the moment they are: Name, Expression Description. Quite a strange order as the Stage properties window shows Name, Description and then Expression. Can the order of the hover information be the same as in the properties? ... View more

I am using BP v6.3.2 and the Internal Object 'Work Queues' is not having an option to check the state of the Item. As of now, we are only having an Update status option available. I would recommend adding an additional option called 'Item State' without locking the item and filtering it with a given input like Tag/Item Key/Created Time etc. With this, we can see the state of Item like Exception/Completed/Pending.  This might be a small concern but it would be really helpful for the developer as well for the support team with this enhancement. ... View more

While opening Excel or while while reading any file we need pass Full file name and path. If Blue prism provides an option to select the file from that folder so that it can take the path and file name automatically after selecting the file. What i mean to say a pop up window should appear like save as window and we should select the file directly from there instead copy the file path and name. ... View more

Currently it is possible to create several references to the same object (process and VBO) resulting in having to 'names' in different locations in the tree view.  Following example assume there is one object (process or VBO) XML that is referenced by two names, objectA and objectB This causes several issues:  objectA is in a restricted group preventing any modification but it is still possible to import objectB to another group and will allow to change the XML by changing objectB although this should be prevented by restrictions on objectA. This is a security hole. It is not obvious if or how many references exist to one object XML. Applying 'delete object' action on one reference actually deletes the XML and all depending references. Deletion of objectA also deletes objectB without warning. Creating a release adds all references to an object and will be imported accordingly, messing up organization by groups. Assuming objectA is in group projectA and there is this other reference objectB in group projectB. If I create a release for projectA and add the objects from this group into a release, also the other references are added from group projectB. When importing the release for projectA there will also a group created named projectB There is no distinction if there are X references or if there is only one reference to an object XML. So it is possible to remove a reference to an object in tree view making it inaccessible, although the XML is still in DB. It is not obvious when a reference is created. For example objectA is exported. Afterwards the objects is relocated to another group and renamed to objectB. The previous export of objectA is imported again which results in having two references to the same object. There will be notification if the object should be replaced during the import but the replacement only refers to the XML but not to the references/names.   In contrast I cannot think of any case to have references to the same object. ... View more