Each version of Blue Prism should display tooltips and highlight new features when installed for the first time. This is a common practice in many tools, as not all users will thoroughly read the release notes or actively explore every new feature. It is the responsibility of the product developers to incorporate such tooltips within the software to ensure users are informed and encouraged to try out the new features. ... View more

Hi,   Please provide more useful options in Decipher IDP Misc Parameters., for example: 1. If I don't want to read a header/footer in a pdf file, an option should be available where i can select On or Off for decipher to not capture the info.  2. if I have a table with 4 columns and I only want to read column 1 and column 3 then should have option of which I can set the columns which Decipher shouldn't identify the regions.  3. Provide proper examples with description for all the available options (Format Expression, formulas etc.,) ... View more

Hi I see few Blue Prism VBO's like (MS Excel VBO, Utility - Collection Manipulation etc.,) has empty/missing description in input/output parameters. This VBOs are downloaded from Blue Prism Digital Exchange. It would be good if the description is available in BP provided vbo's as it will be helpful on how to use it for any solution designer.  Regards, Praveen ... View more

It is possible to start schedule, delete schedule, report on schedule... but there does not seem to be a command to create or retire schedules, which would complete the functionality for CLI commands for AutomateC.exe ... View more

I understand it may improve user experience when they can chose their own language and see Blue Prism UI and log entries in their native language. However, in an international environment with more than one language, this seems to be contra productive as each user creates log entries in their own language with the result of some people see texts in non-native language nonetheless.  I assume most people use English to avoid exactly this situation. Other users do just ignore texts they cannot read.  It becomes more tricky when trying to report on DB level when date format may differ from row to row and instead of one keyword to search for, all possible keywords might have to be considered. Normally only 2-3 language are needed to be considered. Although some users may 'practice their Spanish/French/Chinese...' and may be missed in Audit log analysis. Example: I was querying Audit logs for event 'A%' to get changes to credentials. Additionally I wanted to extract the credential names by taking everything after the keyword 'credentials'. Then I noticed some logs are in another language and I have to search for another keyword as well.  I immediately noticed this issues but I could have easily missed it.  I guess when using the built in Audit report feature it would be quite hard to notice some records are missing in the result. Even more tricky is the situation when sub cultures are used, eg en-UK vs en-US. The text would be the same in both cases but (according to Wiki) UK uses dd/mm/yyyy and US uses mm/dd/yyyy.  It would be great to have one consistent way of representing data in the DB and then only change how this data is represented in UI; not the other way round.  ... View more

We cleaned old entries in the BPAAuditEvents table and noticed we lost some version history in studio. Now old objects that have been created over one year ago and haven't been changed since then do not have any history information at all.  It would be great to have at least some dates and names left in the history after DB house keeping activities. So those objects don't look like they appeared out of nothing.  ... View more

When looking at the overview of product ideas here: Product Ideas - SS&C Blue Prism Community The summaries do not include the info what product the idea is for. I have to open the idea to see if it is related to any product I am concerned about. It would be great to have the related products / labels directly shown in the overview page.    Also, I could not find a fitting 'Idea Label' for this suggestion as general ideas for BP web portal do not have a matching 'Idea Labels'. Also, it is a bit confusing to have 'Idea Labels' mandatory that are related to products but the 'Associated Products' tags are optional and widely overlap with the 'Idea Labels' ... View more

We would like to have more granular control of access rights granted to business objects and processes, where a user can be allowed to execute a process or business object and be able to update the 'Current Value' while in DEBUG mode without the possibility to save Initial Values or the process itself. This is currently only allowed through the  'Edit' permission which would defeat the scope of granting execution permissions only to first line of support. ... View more

Hi This is Hongjun Shin working at Blue Prism Korea. One of our BPK customers manages 50,000 batches. With 50,000 batches, trying to view the history of a batch on the DecipherIDP web page takes a very long time. In addition, a lot of data is stored in the DB, and there comes a point when DB management is required. I've opened a global ticket about this, Currently, there are no query statements to manage DecipherIDP's DB. Also, when I submit batch files to DecipherIDP, if I submit a large number of batch files, it uses up all the transactions on the DB server, preventing other applications from using the DB. Therefore, I would like to have a feature that allows users to set a quantity limit when uploading batches to Decipher. I also asked the global support team about this, but they told me that there is no such feature at the moment. Do you think these two features would be an improvement? 1. Decipher DB cleanup query statement 2. the ability for users to set quantity limits when submitting batch files to DecipherIDP     ... View more

Hello, We would like to have a Search Bar for the Queues and the Sessions similar to the Resources. This would make our work a lot faster.       ... View more

No log out option. User is unable to switch accounts for testing and unable to log out and enter other email address. ... View more

Unable to rename the files while or after uploading. ... View more

Users should have the ability to clear the value selected from a dropdown field especially from non-mandatory dropdowns if user selects a value accidentally, currently it forces user to select a value from dropdown instead leaving it as blank. Usually, dropdowns add a blank value to the list of values which gives the user the ability to set the dropdown to blank. ... View more

1. Upload documents not user friendly. Can it be changed so that the user bulk uploads the documents and then selects the document type.   2. The document that you upload disappear when you change the document type, this is confusing for the user and makes them question whether something has been uploaded. The user also cannot easily see what they have uploaded before submitting. ... View more

UX builder should have an ability to throw a validation error when user attempt to upload a file of size exceeding maximum permitted limit. Currently it creates a work object and discards attachment creation in chorus without an indication to the user of attachment creation failure. Ideally a validation error should be displayed to the user upfront and should not create work object until validation is corrected.  ... View more

We would like to request the ability to perform an action on multiple selected rows on a table. At the moment, actions, such as executing a service, are only available for a single selected row, but we would like for it to be enhanced to include performing an action for multiple selected rows. The following use cases would greatly benefit from such functionality: Selecting multiple rows on a table and marking a flag on them (invalidating, or validating, or simply marking the rows) Selecting multiple rows and deleting them Both of these become cumbersome when the user has to individual action each row. For example in the following form, when it is converted into a UXB form, we would like to be able to perform the highlighted actions on multiple rows, rather than sequentially one after the other for a better user experience: In this instance, the Delete Turns button would mark multiple selected rows as deleted. There could be an instance where the rows may need to be removed from the table altogether. And the Reinstate Turns  button would update certain fields on the selected rows.  ... View more

When the Time field format is selected on a field in UX Builder, the custom masking functionality does not allow the same level of functionality that Classic & Dynamic forms provide in conjunction with the data dictionary and masking. For example, in the two screenshots below, the user can simply add numbers (such as 0930) and the form will automatically add a colon (making it 09:30), while still providing validation that would be applicable on a time field. There is currently no way to enforce a colon on a time field in UX Builder using the current masking options available. The user either has to add one manually, or additional validation needs to be performed using underlying UX Services. Neither is ideal as it differs from existing behavior.    ... View more

It is my understanding that the communications print server prints one document at a time.  If for some reason the current print job is corrupted or slow performing a bottleneck is created for other released documents. We'd like to see an option to print up to x (configurable) documents concurrently. ... View more

I wanted to quickly submit this as a possible bug or future improvement. Please let me know if the below information is not clear enough for reproducing the issue.   Today, we encountered an issue with negative priorities on queue items in a Production automation. We will be adjusting the automation probably to not use negative priorities anymore. I just wanted to be clear that this is not or at least soon will not be affecting us anymore, but it would be good to add this to the Blue Prism Dev backlog if it's not already there.   Blue Prism versions tested: 6.10.1 & 7.3.1 -- Same behavior observed in both   Description of the issue: Most people only use priorities of 0+, but there are times that you may want to increase the priority of a specific work queue item to be higher than the average queue item. The only way to do that above a priority of 0 is to go into the negative numbers (or redesign the automation so that the initial priority is something like 100 or 200 etc.). What we discovered is that you cannot use the Work Queues Internal Business Object's action "Set Priority" to set a priority of -1. The error you get is "No priority specified". This is the same error you get if you use this action without providing a number. However, you can supply any other (at least 32 bit) negative number such as -2 or -200, and it will set the Priority just fine. Along with this, you can use the action "Add To Queue" and provide any negative number INCLUDING -1. This is the only way I have found to be able to use negative one as the priority is if you set it when initially adding the item to the queue.   Thoughts: I don't know what Blue Prism's opinion is on this. My suspicion is that negative numbers were not intended to be allowed. But if that were the case, I would think there'd be an input validation on Add To Queue and Set Priority to require that the number is at least 0, but neither of them have such a validation. So, my request is that these two be made to have the same functionality. Either make them both not support negative numbers, or make them both support all negative numbers including -1. The problem with the first option is that you could be breaking automations for customers that rely on negative numbers in some way. The second option is probably the better solution, and the only change required is to the Set Priority action so that it handles the priority in the same way that Add To Queue does, allowing for -1 to be a valid input. Steps to recreate: To recreate this issue, create a queue item using Add To Queue. There will be no issues at this point no matter what priority you use. 1, 0, -1, -2. All of these work. Next, in some way, get the Item ID of the item you just created. It will be in the output collection of Item IDs when adding to the queue. It could also be retrieved from the output of Get Next Item, etc. Next, using the Item ID of the pending item, use the action Set Priority and give it a Priority of -1. This will fail with the error "No priority specified". Next you could try -2. This should succeed. For BP personnel: Same content submitted in Ticket #299379 ... View more