We would like to have more granular control of access rights granted to business objects and processes, where a user can be allowed to execute a process or business object and be able to update the 'Current Value' while in DEBUG mode without the possibility to save Initial Values or the process itself. This is currently only allowed through the  'Edit' permission which would defeat the scope of granting execution permissions only to first line of support. ... View more

Hi This is Hongjun Shin working at Blue Prism Korea. One of our BPK customers manages 50,000 batches. With 50,000 batches, trying to view the history of a batch on the DecipherIDP web page takes a very long time. In addition, a lot of data is stored in the DB, and there comes a point when DB management is required. I've opened a global ticket about this, Currently, there are no query statements to manage DecipherIDP's DB. Also, when I submit batch files to DecipherIDP, if I submit a large number of batch files, it uses up all the transactions on the DB server, preventing other applications from using the DB. Therefore, I would like to have a feature that allows users to set a quantity limit when uploading batches to Decipher. I also asked the global support team about this, but they told me that there is no such feature at the moment. Do you think these two features would be an improvement? 1. Decipher DB cleanup query statement 2. the ability for users to set quantity limits when submitting batch files to DecipherIDP     ... View more

Hello, We would like to have a Search Bar for the Queues and the Sessions similar to the Resources. This would make our work a lot faster.       ... View more

No log out option. User is unable to switch accounts for testing and unable to log out and enter other email address. ... View more

Unable to rename the files while or after uploading. ... View more

Users should have the ability to clear the value selected from a dropdown field especially from non-mandatory dropdowns if user selects a value accidentally, currently it forces user to select a value from dropdown instead leaving it as blank. Usually, dropdowns add a blank value to the list of values which gives the user the ability to set the dropdown to blank. ... View more

1. Upload documents not user friendly. Can it be changed so that the user bulk uploads the documents and then selects the document type.   2. The document that you upload disappear when you change the document type, this is confusing for the user and makes them question whether something has been uploaded. The user also cannot easily see what they have uploaded before submitting. ... View more

UX builder should have an ability to throw a validation error when user attempt to upload a file of size exceeding maximum permitted limit. Currently it creates a work object and discards attachment creation in chorus without an indication to the user of attachment creation failure. Ideally a validation error should be displayed to the user upfront and should not create work object until validation is corrected.  ... View more

We would like to request the ability to perform an action on multiple selected rows on a table. At the moment, actions, such as executing a service, are only available for a single selected row, but we would like for it to be enhanced to include performing an action for multiple selected rows. The following use cases would greatly benefit from such functionality: Selecting multiple rows on a table and marking a flag on them (invalidating, or validating, or simply marking the rows) Selecting multiple rows and deleting them Both of these become cumbersome when the user has to individual action each row. For example in the following form, when it is converted into a UXB form, we would like to be able to perform the highlighted actions on multiple rows, rather than sequentially one after the other for a better user experience: In this instance, the Delete Turns button would mark multiple selected rows as deleted. There could be an instance where the rows may need to be removed from the table altogether. And the Reinstate Turns  button would update certain fields on the selected rows.  ... View more

When the Time field format is selected on a field in UX Builder, the custom masking functionality does not allow the same level of functionality that Classic & Dynamic forms provide in conjunction with the data dictionary and masking. For example, in the two screenshots below, the user can simply add numbers (such as 0930) and the form will automatically add a colon (making it 09:30), while still providing validation that would be applicable on a time field. There is currently no way to enforce a colon on a time field in UX Builder using the current masking options available. The user either has to add one manually, or additional validation needs to be performed using underlying UX Services. Neither is ideal as it differs from existing behavior.    ... View more

It is my understanding that the communications print server prints one document at a time.  If for some reason the current print job is corrupted or slow performing a bottleneck is created for other released documents. We'd like to see an option to print up to x (configurable) documents concurrently. ... View more

I wanted to quickly submit this as a possible bug or future improvement. Please let me know if the below information is not clear enough for reproducing the issue.   Today, we encountered an issue with negative priorities on queue items in a Production automation. We will be adjusting the automation probably to not use negative priorities anymore. I just wanted to be clear that this is not or at least soon will not be affecting us anymore, but it would be good to add this to the Blue Prism Dev backlog if it's not already there.   Blue Prism versions tested: 6.10.1 & 7.3.1 -- Same behavior observed in both   Description of the issue: Most people only use priorities of 0+, but there are times that you may want to increase the priority of a specific work queue item to be higher than the average queue item. The only way to do that above a priority of 0 is to go into the negative numbers (or redesign the automation so that the initial priority is something like 100 or 200 etc.). What we discovered is that you cannot use the Work Queues Internal Business Object's action "Set Priority" to set a priority of -1. The error you get is "No priority specified". This is the same error you get if you use this action without providing a number. However, you can supply any other (at least 32 bit) negative number such as -2 or -200, and it will set the Priority just fine. Along with this, you can use the action "Add To Queue" and provide any negative number INCLUDING -1. This is the only way I have found to be able to use negative one as the priority is if you set it when initially adding the item to the queue.   Thoughts: I don't know what Blue Prism's opinion is on this. My suspicion is that negative numbers were not intended to be allowed. But if that were the case, I would think there'd be an input validation on Add To Queue and Set Priority to require that the number is at least 0, but neither of them have such a validation. So, my request is that these two be made to have the same functionality. Either make them both not support negative numbers, or make them both support all negative numbers including -1. The problem with the first option is that you could be breaking automations for customers that rely on negative numbers in some way. The second option is probably the better solution, and the only change required is to the Set Priority action so that it handles the priority in the same way that Add To Queue does, allowing for -1 to be a valid input. Steps to recreate: To recreate this issue, create a queue item using Add To Queue. There will be no issues at this point no matter what priority you use. 1, 0, -1, -2. All of these work. Next, in some way, get the Item ID of the item you just created. It will be in the output collection of Item IDs when adding to the queue. It could also be retrieved from the output of Get Next Item, etc. Next, using the Item ID of the pending item, use the action Set Priority and give it a Priority of -1. This will fail with the error "No priority specified". Next you could try -2. This should succeed. For BP personnel: Same content submitted in Ticket #299379 ... View more

The Current date format is YYYY/MM/DD and needs to be changed to Month/DD/YYYY. ... View more

The output action/form in Blue Prism Desktop is limited in functionality.  All output is single data item based and is displayed stacked where the Label sits above the value of the data item.  We have use cases where we want to display a large list of data items (roughly 24 fields).  Found that the display of these fields required a scroll bar on the right of the BP Desktop screen and the Label/values were aligned to the left of the screen.  It would be useful to allow the use of collections in output actions, provided the number of columns is limited to the width of the output form.  Expanding the output form width so that it fits more data to handle a table/collection would also help.  Currently the output form can only expand height-wise, not width-wise. ... View more

As a process designer I would like to be able to compare two versions of a model and for the differences to be highlighted in Design Studio.   This will help me identify and assess the impact of changes. The bpmn.io framework used by Design Studio supports this capability, but we currently need to export models to use it. ... View more

Hi Everyone I'm Emmanuel Katto from Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE), What do you think about the need for a built-in code scanner in Blue Prism to ensure security and compliance? Do you think it would make a significant difference in our projects?   Regards Emmanuel Katto ... View more

Introduction of new functionality in BluePrism enterprise that uses latest GenAI models to assist in the  development, training of RPA processes and objects to accelerate development time. Taking this further at runtime using GenAI models to generate the process and object code based on a set of instructions or procedural documentation etc..for the automate.exe to then execute.  ... View more

Currently during the import process about non information is available, like target groups or what are the items causing conflict. It would be great to have some type of preview window showing the contained items and structure similar to what is available in Releases tab.  Also nice would be the creation date of the package being part of the release file. Currently the 'create' date shown in Releases tab is the date assigned by the local client, either date of creation when creating a new package or the date of import. This means when moving a release to another environment the creation date of the package there will be different to the creation date of the originating environment. It would make more sense to have creation / modify date static as part of the release and maybe add another column (eg release date) for when the package was last imported/exported. ... View more

In Blue Prism UI, opening tab: Releases, in the main window named Package Overview, several columns with information on existing/known releases and packages is shown in list view with columns: name, created, created by and last release. The provided information would be much more valuable if the columns could be sorted and maybe even filtered.  I just imported a release file, not knowing if the target is an existing group, a new group (and what it's name) or if it maybe was done as adhoc package. Being able to sort columns would greatly increase the chance of finding the package. ... View more