related to following idea, which also provide further details: https://community.blueprism.com/ideas/viewidea?IdeationKey=685838f9-1ad8-4ed9-b293-cc951d97904e The idea is to change the system wide setting for browser extension port assignment to be per object/process. It should be possible to set default behavior to dynamically assigned ports but tell BP to use standard port when attaching to running browser instance.  Using standard ports when attaching to browser could be new default behavior (since it is obvious dynamic ports won't work). ... View more

Hi, Communty.   I have two processes that runs background features (.bat, .vbs) and some calculations and send email task that are also background staff.   My idea is to run this two processes in the same runtime resource at the same time.   Is that possible now?   I have the best practice topology installed, app server, database, runtime resources all in different hosts.   I want to do this from the control room.   Best regards. ... View more

Hello, BP v6.x could desperately use some UI enhancements.  We're on 6.5 upgrading to 6.9, and the following problems still exist. 1) Saving the window states.  You open up System-> Credentials as an example, and the Credential column is too narrow to read the names.  So you drag the bar to widen that column.  Leave that window and come back later -- the column is narrow again.  This issue is most annoying in Credential Details (adjusting columns in Processes, Resources, & Roles) and the Control Room (adjusting window widths & heights to better view queue names, resources, etc). 2) Control room log viewing - these logs are thousands of lines long.  I want to open them full screen.  Please stop opening them in tiny windows.  Allow me to save my preference of opening full screen. 3) Control room resource window - I don't want to view the Default folder.  We have our resources in other folders.  Please allow us to keep the Default folder closed. Thank you for your consideration. ... View more

Problem Statement: In BluePrism version 6.4.1  to 6.7.1  we don't have option for searching an Object .In most of the cases we need to call the objects from processes using Action stage. Manual searching and adding action in workflows is tedious and time consuming process.   Resolution:  To overcome this issue we need add search engine for BluePrism which will allow us to search and copy the actions into the workflow. Implementation: Created PowerShell script which act as a search engine for BluePrism objects. Search the object and copy the required action to clipboard. Usage:  Right click and run the script using PowerShell Below window will appear Search for the required Object   Copy the Object Paste it in BluePrism workflow   ... View more

I think there should be a community edition/Trial version of all product like decipher or interact to learn and dig into that product. That will help to learn the platform and will increase the interest of learning. ... View more

We have had multiple occasions where customer needs to transfer data from environment to another environment. Currently we are able export credentials and workqueues but on a name and a structure level only meaning that the contents are not transferred. When customer has 1000 or more credentials and workqueues where history etc needs to be transferred, a simple data transfer operation that should not take more than 15 minutes is suddenly a two month project or even longer since every credential needs to be manually re-entered, processes to be created to export workqueue items contents to excel file or something similar. Blue Prism already has AES256 encrypt/decrypt possibilities so I would assume it should not be too much of a hassle to add encrypt/decrypt into the process of exporting packages, for example making it only possible to export/import to an environment with same Encryption Schemas ... View more

Can we add an action under Studio for 'move to a folder' that can be enable a developer to move process/objects created and available under one folder to another folder ? This will save time and effort to drag and drop process/object from one folder to another. ... View more

We run several independent BP instances to serve multiple development teams.  Information about usage, status, schedule, licenses, ... is hard separated and has to be evaluated for each instance independently.  It would be nice to have one common supervisor server, which at least makes meta data available conveniently.  This could also serve for central license management. This could also be seen as big step towards multi tenancy. ... View more

Hi, I am wondering why after so long why is BluePrism doing the auto conversion of Date & Datetime to UTC. It is definitly the most annoying thing in BluePrism. It is literally frustrating to work with anything Date related in the software. Why not give the ability to deactivate this conversion that it always does? Even when your datetime is already in UTC time, it will convert it anyway, making your date so out of whack that it doesn't make sense anymore... and don't get me started on collection with date where you need to loop in the collection. You can get them converted a lot and making your process a lot harder to develop because you need to account for those instead of just doing that yourself if you need to. BluePrism should never touch any variable automatically without the dev actually doing something. using  DateTimeKind works for the first time when you output but BluePrism clears that after that point so it doesn't really matter what kind it is. Please let user do their things. I know I am not the only one having trouble with that. I saw in another company devs that were using SQL query to get the "Now()" date instead of Blueprism cause it was more reliable. That's not normal to have to do workaround like that for anything. I've been working with BluePrism since version 4 and this is by far the worse thing that has been following us since then. regards, ... View more

Whilst upgrading between BluePrism versions we noticed that a locked environment lock never got released due to the process getting stuck and not stopping as expected before the operation commenced. This meant, the lock got carried over to upgraded version in the database but not visible in the front UI screens, which prevented lock with similar name getting acquired by the process. A simple query to reset the value to NULL in respective fields on BPAEnvLock table would ensure a clean upgrade and avert such issues. ... View more

Set Next stage is something highly used menu item. Why don't we move it to title bar somewhere, because current UI we have a lot of empty space there to put important option directly on title and header area. Every time performing right click, find option, scroll to bottom and there the most useful button SetNextStage is. So hope this is taken under consideration . ... View more

In BluePrism I feel a need of button which can take screen focus to current active stage (Yellow Color). I particularly feel need of this button on large project which uses large canvas size, so while I am testing it step by step and move to other area(to check value of data item) I can go back to current active stage once I click that button. ... View more

The application manager offers two attributes after spying an SAP-element: - ComponentType - ID When setting the match type to "Wildcard", Blue Prism cannot find the element. So wildcard search seems not to work here. It would be great if wildcards are also available for SAP elements as this would reduce the need for custom built solutions where the complete ID is not know in advance. In addition to this it should be possible for read-stages to have a "Get ID"-option. When you combine both, we could do the following: - Set the attribute ID in application manager to dynamic - insert a read stage, set the ID parameter to wildcard und put in the parts you know - use the new "Get ID" option to get the complete id For further processing the ID could be cached in a data item und nomore wildcard search is needed because the ID is already known. ... View more

The dependency functionality introduced from V5 is great as it's accessible from the object, process and package level. From a process perspective, you can see object, environment variable, calendar, credential dependency but there is no option to view subprocesses.This is a real hassle when migrating a process that has a number of subprocesses from one BP version to the other. ... View more

Having recently migrated some processes from V4.2 to v6.5, I discovered there was a real need for a migration tool. To buttress my point, the migration tool will 1. Automatically migrate all processes, objects, environments and other assets without any manual intervention. The only manual intervention will be to trigger the tool (.exe). We had over 100+ processes in v4.2 and moving across to the new environment was a real pain 2. Compare the versions of assets(process, env variables) if they already exist in the target environment. Technically, our strategy was to keep two environments running currently and any migration failure experienced in v6 will result in roll back changes and back to V4. After migration, some shared objects were amended in V4 by other developers, That automatically left both environments out of sync and sometimes, the new asset isn't moved over to V6.4. 3. Automatically takes a snapshot of all assets by automatically associating dependencies with processes and creating releases. I know my comments sound ambitious but this will alleviate some of the laborious tasks with respect to migration. ... View more

At this moment there is no possibility to segregate users in Decipher based on some restrictions. Therefore all business users created in Decipher can see all documents. This is not sufficient for certain confidential documents.  The requirement would be - more granular user permissions based around Document Types. ... View more

Blue Prism exclusively restrict access for importing or exporting the objects and processes under User Roles level. It does not restrict access from importing or exporting the objects and processes under folder levels individually. We are facing multiple issues with this limitation that we can't restirct the import access rights at folder level. Example: Developers should be allowed to import process specific objects or processes only. They should not be allowed to import reusable objects/Processes/VBO's ... View more

Since developers should spend time to create Environment Variable descriptions in Control when they are defined (and/or updated) - it would be helpful if that definition was pulled into Data Item stages once the Environment Variable is selected in the Data Item stage. This would reduce the number of times developers must describe Environment Variables when a definition already exists in Control. The description could be carried in as editable text in case a developer wants to edit or augment the description if required to make their logic clearer. ... View more

I think it would be useful to be able to validate the schema of work queue items before they get added to a work queue. My thought is an XSD validation string or or some such mechanism could be associated with the work queue. The Add to Queue action could use it to validate that the data being added to the queue is valid before proceeding. The advantage of this is that processes that use the work queue would be able to safely assume that any data entered into the queue is valid. Further, it would mean that exceptions due to invalid data would happen at the time that data is being added to the queue, as opposed to when the data is being read from the queue. On a practical level, this may not happen often since users should be testing what data is being added into queues before going live with it. However, this would still be a gain because it would be one less thing that you have to think about while building processes. ... View more