It might be useful to have code snippet options available within code stages to allow for fast development of custom code stages. This would also benefit those will limited knowledge on coding and help them understand code stages where they might need to investigate, troubleshoot and fix code. This could be limited to areas within vb such as ms office applications, outlook, excel etc. ... View more

Regarding the operation when "Any approver" is selected in Interact > Create form > Default approval type, the guide says "anyone who is a member of the role will be able to approve any requests". https://bpdocs.blueprism.com/hub-interact/4-7/en-us/z-pdf/4-7/Blue%20Prism%20Interact%204.7%20-%20Plugin%20User%20Guide.pdf But actually, approval requests are sent not only to the approvers within the role set on the form, but to all users who have been granted approver privileges. When I asked for the support desk about this point, it was the answer that it is the current specification. However, when operating Interact in a large-scale organization, even if there is a case where approval is requested to the superior of one's own group, there is no case where an approval request is sent to all approval authority holders within the organization regardless of the group. Therefore, we are unable to use the approval function in actual operation. Please consider changing the specifications that Approval requests can be sent to any approver within a specific group, such as sending to approvers within the role specified in "Interact role" or allowing the selection of a role to which approval is sent separately from "Interact role"  ----------------------------- Interactフォームの基本設定 ＞ 「デフォルト承認タイプ」で「任意の承認者」を選択した場合、ガイド上は「役割（role）のメンバーであれば～承認できます」と記載があります。 これに対し現状では、フォームに設定した「役割（role）」内の承認者だけでなく、Hubで「approver」の権限（permission）が与えられたユーザ全員に承認依頼が送信されます。この点サポートデスクに確認したところでは、現在の仕様であるとの回答でした。 しかし大規模組織でInteractを運用する場合においては、自グループの上司に承認を依頼するケースはあっても、グループにかかわらず組織内の承認権限保持者全員に承認依頼を出すというケースは通常あり得ないため、実際の運用にせっかくの承認機能を使用できずにいます。 「Interact role」で指定した役割内の承認者に送信する仕様とするか、「Interact role」とは別に承認を送る「役割（role）」を選択できる仕様とするなど、特定のグループ内の任意の承認者に承認依頼が送信されるよう、仕様の変更を検討お願いします。 ... View more

When logging in to Hub using SSO, the login screen is displayed even though ID/Pass is not required. End users have said that it is a small thing, but if they use it frequently, unnecessary screen transitions can be stressful. Could you please consider changing the specification so that it transitions directly to the Hub/Interct selection screen instead of the login screen? ----------------------------- SSOを使用してHubにログインする際に、ID/Passの入力は不要なのにもかかわらず、ログイン画面が表示されます。 エンドユーザより、ちょっとしたことだが頻繁に使用していると無駄な画面遷移がストレスに感じられるという声がありました。 ログイン画面ではなくダイレクトにHub/Interctの選択画面に遷移するよう、仕様の変更を検討いただけないでしょうか。 ... View more

アタッチ失敗時のExceptionDetail()の内容が「エラー：Internal : ページ 'アタッチ' の操作ステージ 'アタッチ'でステップ1を実行できませんでした - 対象アプリケーションを識別できませんでした。アプリケーションが 次のアクション入力、アプリケーションモデル識別子を確認してください：WindowTitle, ProcessName を実行していることを確かめ、」と不完全のため、サポートに問い合わせた結果、仕様通りとの回答をいただきました。ExceptionDetail()の内容をメールに記載しているため、アタッチ失敗時のExceptionDetail()の不完全な内容を解消してほしいです。 ... View more

Concern is that a reply can be made to comments at different dates/times, so a reply can be missed by business users for day to day processing.  Options are to either: 1. create a resource so that we can give specific users access to be able to REPLY OR 2. add in the Reply Filter in Comments  ... View more

Currently in Decipher, there is no way to adjust the column width of a table. This becomes extremely problematic when there are more than 4 or 5 columns in a table. Because you are unable to adjust the column widths, it makes it virtually impossible for a user to validate that the information has been extracted correctly. The user can't see what information is in the box because the column width is about 1 character wide. Decipher has the ability to split out the image/document into another screen and make the DFD appear on one screen but even then, the table remains small (doesn't display the length of the screen like all the fields) and also doesn't allow you to adjust the column widths. Update: In version 2.2 you can now adjust the column widths of a table but you are unable to save the widths. You should be able to adjust to a certain width so that every time you go into a document, the width of each column remains. Asking a user to do this on each document is cumbersome and tedious. ... View more

As a user of ROS I need the ability to see a meaningful name on the word document banner. Once the document has been saved to chorus and the document is reopened, the word banner shows the content id as the file name.  This is not user friendly and does not allow the user to easily identify the document they need to work on – especially if there are multiple open. We need the ability to configure within ROS the field (LOB or other data field) that should be used in the word banner display. ... View more

As a user of ROS I need the ability to save the document to chorus using a keyboard shortcut (hot key such as control + s).  The document should remain open. The save to chorus button on the plug in closes the document.  This means the user constantly must reopen the document to continue with the editing.  ... View more

based on ticket #251602 BP allows the definition of external web services that then can be used as Action stages.  There is an option in the definition 'Disable Sending of Request' which is a nice feature to first do same dry runs before actually sending the WS request. However, the output of this Action changes depending if the 'Disable Sending of Request' is activated or not: some header lines of the request are omitted in the Request Output data. In our tests these header lines were missing when 'Disable Sending of Request' was active: 'Host', 'Content-Length', 'Connection' Since this is intentionally 'by design' I am creating this enhancement idea to have all header lines shown in the request output, regardless if 'Disable Sending of Request' is active or not.  ... View more

In the current Decipher we don't have an option in the UI to modify the existing dashboards under reports. Adding an option to customize the dashboards or adding/creating new tiles (similar to Blue Prism enterprise) will help the business to track/create the model according to their wish.  ... View more

We have several developers across various parts of the business using the same BP server but we'll each maybe only need to get to a handful of the processes or objects. Could we add a favourites option so each user can limit the default view to bits they want/need to see? ... View more

Many of our clients want to build the infrastructure for Blue Prism into their existing IT environment, which is often Server based only.  They do not run any Windows 10 or Windows 11 VMs, so they want to build Server OS machines for the runtime resources.   We have successfully used Windows Server 2012 and Server 2016 with Desktop Experience as runtime resources.  These were supported according to older documentation. Currently, it is shown that Windows Server is not supported at all for Runtime Resources.  I raised a ticket about it, and they say Windows Server is not supported, although it might work. It would be very useful for there to be support for Windows Server OS for runtime resources, as a number of our clients are reluctant to build Win 10 or Win 11 machines, and we have successfully been using Server 2012 and 2016.  As these versions are getting quite old now, I would like Server 2019 (and newer versions) to be supported. ... View more

With the growing security concerns, many organization requires the new product/system to meet their minimum security standard, We have noticed that the BluePrism7.1.2 Interactive client on-prem, HUB,  and Interact have no option to limit the concurrent user session to 1 user. i.e., same user able to login from different browser and different nodes at the same time.  It would be really great if this feature is onboarded in the upcoming release. ... View more

When printing letters we need the functionality to mimic what we have available in Deferred print EnCorr.  After initiating the print, we need the ability to go the physical printer and unlock the job so that it does not interfere with any current jobs being printed.  Currently it prints right away which can mix the letters with other jobs being printed. ... View more

BPO needs the ability to sort Deferred letters needing printed by Business Area versus Client.  Client is shared across BA's to take advantage of Conditional Content and reduce the amount of Content and Composition stored.  Using CDOC maybe the object id could be stored/presented by BA. ... View more

Additional options when creating a rule would be very helpful and reduce the volume of rules required for a form. My highest priority would be to have AND / OR settings (for example, field2 state is mandatory if field1 has a value of 'A', 'B' or 'C'). A While option would also be very useful as this would prevent the need to create 2+ rules in case a user changes something on the form (for example, field2 state is hidden while field1 = 'no'). Other suggestions include rules based on more than one field and any other basic functions. We currently have a very simple form which usually displays 7 fields on 1 page which uses 130 rules, the above changes would reduce that to under 10 rules. ... View more

The Inbox allows users to sort / filter on various fields, however, as soon as the user navigates away from the Inbox then any applied filters etc. are reset. It would improve the user's experience if these settings could be saved / stored. For example, a user may change the number of rows displayed from the default 5 to 25, sort by oldest to newest and then filter for a certain form / key value but this is then reset as soon as they open a form. ... View more

Hi All, Good day. I am currently using the attached file to get BOT Actual and Planned Utilization. The idea is I am manually plotting all processes running in one Runtime Resource so I can easily check schedules and overlaps. Next is I am plotting the actual allotted time for each process to know Actual Utilization then I will plot planned allotted time for process currently in development to know Planned Utilization. I would like to know if Blue Prism has dashboards that can display the following: 1. Digital worker capacity planning base on the planned processes and current running processes 2. Digital worker for actual utilization Regards, Jared ... View more