We are on Chorus version 21.2.4.7 With this version of Processor, we are noticing that children of a case are ordered by the date the child is associated to the case, with the oldest children at the top. As a result of this single order (on date), various types of children -- Transactions, Tasks, and Paperclips -- are scattered throughout the list of child objects to the case. Our users would love to see Transactions grouped together (sorted by date), Tasks grouped together (sorted by date), and Paperclips groups together (also sorted by date).  This would allow users who are looking for a specific TYPE of child to be more easily find it. As a further improvement, it would be nice if an option was added to the User Preferences page that would allow the user to determine which of these groups (Transactions, Tasks, Paperclips) were at the top, middle, and bottom of the groups. ... View more

There are times when work can get stuck in a process and either be locked to SYSTEM or just plain be stuck.  If this occurs, the work has to be manually aborted via a SQL update to the "state" in the WU8 DB table.  This either has to be done by a DBA on a non-hosted environment or by our hosting group via a hosting ticket if they are hosted.  This will then allow the work object to be aborted so it will show in the Process Monitor Aborted tab to be resumed.  It would be nice if the client had an admin type tool to be able to manually abort a work object without having to update at the DB level or open a ticket with hosting to have it done. ... View more

The Custom Search option for Processor Workspace is a very welcome enhancement.  However the Saved Searches show at bottom of a list and when large amount of Searches this makes Custom Searches less helpful than they should be (because need to screoll through 30+ searches to get to Custome Searches).  Could we have Custom Searches show at the top of the Search list? ... View more

When a process or business object's name is changed all references to that process or business object are lost. This great affect reusability and results in artifacts with improper names to retain references. Proposed Solution: Artifacts have a NAME (static for DB), LABEL (shown in GUI for ease), and DESCRIPTION. This will allow artifacts to have their LABEL updated easily without breaking any references to that artifact. ... View more

I think it would be a great idea to have an auto complete feature in the expressions editor so if you start typing a data item or collection name it will suggest options based on the already created data items or collections within your process or object. and then if you press the tab key it will auto complete the name in the editor for you. I've attached a mock up to visualise how this could look. I feel this would save a little time but also it would make it simpler with less clicking involved. ... View more

Hi Team, We have 60+ Process created and each process has average of 10 to 15 environment variables, which is going to nearly 600+ Environment variables created. The challenges we are facing is searching the required environment variables to update values. As there are many Env. Var. created, we see that, slowness in scrolling to required variable. This we are facing for 60+ Process, if we cross 100+ process, it will be tedious to serach the required Env. variable. So, is it possible to allow developer to create a folder for the respective process, under that, he/she can create environment variables with respect to that process. So for 60 process, we will end up in creating 60 folders, under that we can have 'n' number of Env. variables. This will be easy to search the variable, fast accessing and will be well organized. Please let me know, if this can be implemented in all version of BP (atleast starting from 6.8.0). I have attached reference screenshot of control room, same way, if you could implement for Environment variables also. ... View more

When logging in to Hub using SSO, the login screen is displayed even though ID/Pass is not required. End users have said that it is a small thing, but if they use it frequently, unnecessary screen transitions can be stressful. Could you please consider changing the specification so that it transitions directly to the Hub/Interct selection screen instead of the login screen? ----------------------------- SSOを使用してHubにログインする際に、ID/Passの入力は不要なのにもかかわらず、ログイン画面が表示されます。 エンドユーザより、ちょっとしたことだが頻繁に使用していると無駄な画面遷移がストレスに感じられるという声がありました。 ログイン画面ではなくダイレクトにHub/Interctの選択画面に遷移するよう、仕様の変更を検討いただけないでしょうか。 ... View more

My client feedback on the Comment box of the Processor workspace is too short, suggest to enlarge the comment box so that it is easier for user to enter multiple lines. ... View more

Printing AWD history from view station generated a .pdf file which could be presented to auditors for review.  History exported from Portal is presented as a .csv file and is editable prior to printing to .pdf.  Clients feel this is a shortcoming, a potential audit finding. ... View more

Current behavior: If you add, edit, or delete an environment variable and then navigate away to another tab (away from the System tab) without clicking Apply and then come back to the System tab and go to environment variables, you'll see that your add/edit/delete wasn't actually committed to the database. This is not a great user experience. What makes this even worse is that at least in v7.3.1, you can navigate to another part of the System tab and then come back to Environment Variables (thinking this will have refreshed them), and you'll see your updates are still there. Only when you navigate away from the System tab and come back are you able to identify that the change was discarded. I know someone who once deleted hundreds of environment variables that weren't needed anymore only to find out later that all that effort was negated because he didn't see the Apply button at the bottom right or simply forgot to click it. Suggested new behavior: As soon as you navigate away from the Environment Variables screen, a modal dialog popup should show asking whether you want to Apply changes or not. It would be awesome if it told you what environment variables are affected but that isn't a big deal to me. Secondary suggested new behavior: 6 years ago, someone made a good suggestion here, but that was back before the current version of the Blue Prism Community, so I wanted to bring it here in the Ideas section. The suggestion was to add some kind of indicator next to each environment variable that was added/updated showing that the changes have not yet been saved. I think this would be nice but isn't required, in my opinion. If this suggestion has already been made in the Ideas section here, I couldn't find it. ... View more

Printed history from viewstation rendered in .pdf referenced all/any indexed values (ba/worktype/status/, fund/account, SSN, Misc ID) at the top of each page along with the CRDA ensuring the printed history could be verified back to the selected fund/account (primarily used for internal/external audit review of processed work) and the date time the history was printed.  In Portal, only the business area and worktype are presented on the history card along with a truncated CRDA so it is not possible to tie back the history to the selected item and no indexed values are captured on the current .csv export.     ... View more

Right now, BP does not have trigger-based run features, which are much needed in automation. This is something that can be added in the BP, as there is no native trigger-based mechanism. It is much needed and useful in many use cases where users don't want to keep polling and occupying licenses. ... View more

It would be nice to have a small table of historic releases in DX for VBO. This may show the date of release, version number, release notes / summary   edit: Link to current discussion on this topic: Digital Exchange Updates (general) | Digital Exchange (blueprism.com)   Also as mentioned by Wagner Vasconcelos, it would be a great addition to the search function to have the 'change date' as field to search and filter in DX ... View more

アタッチ失敗時のExceptionDetail()の内容が「エラー：Internal : ページ 'アタッチ' の操作ステージ 'アタッチ'でステップ1を実行できませんでした - 対象アプリケーションを識別できませんでした。アプリケーションが 次のアクション入力、アプリケーションモデル識別子を確認してください：WindowTitle, ProcessName を実行していることを確かめ、」と不完全のため、サポートに問い合わせた結果、仕様通りとの回答をいただきました。ExceptionDetail()の内容をメールに記載しているため、アタッチ失敗時のExceptionDetail()の不完全な内容を解消してほしいです。 ... View more

With the Releases panel being te mess it is, it does not cater for organizing the long list of packages made over the years. The possibility by higher management to not allow the deletion of old releases does not contribute to the situation.  What I'd like to have is the possibility to add folders on the Release panel. These can be used to organize the packages made over the years and result in some order in the chaos that is the Releases panel today. Each department running RPA can have its own folder. Old packages can be moved to dedicated folders that management has the ability to clean-up on request. Happy coding! --------------- Paul Sweden ... View more

We would like to have the ability to not choose to display the Filter and Sort options on a table in UX Builder. Currently, these options are shown on all tables by default at runtime, and we would like it so that they can be toggled on or off, depending on the requirement. This would make it so that certain table elements can be used purely for displaying data without the need to take any action on said table. If any actions are required by the use case (for example row select, delete, sort, etc.), they can be configured specifically.  ... View more

We would like to have the ability to configure custom tabbing orders on UX Builder forms to enable UX and navigation through the forms as per specific requirements.. This functionality currently exists in Dynamic and Classic Forms, and should therefore be present in UXB as well. ... View more

When the 'Edit/Delete Rows' functionality is selected in the Table Operations for a UX Builder table, we would like to have the option of being able to perform specific actions, such as executing a service for example, when the user edits a row and then clicks the Update button: Since this functionality does not currently exist, it is not possible to update a row of information on a table directly from UX Builder into a custom table on the database.  ... View more

Currently in AWD 20.3 the max length of a manually created variable is limited to 75 characters.  Client has need where they enter up to a 750 character variable text that they need to be included in letter. Within Communications - Data Source Setup, created variable with field type of "textarea" but length cannot be set beyond 75 characters.  Has this been addressed in later release? On horizon?  If not then this is desired so larger text variables could be passed into Word during letter generation. ... View more