​There should be the possiblitity to order Blue Prism internal list views. For example the Manage Access Rights window in which User Roles are displayed randomly. Expected behavior would be, a click on column name alternates sort order between ascending and descending. Nice to have is also to possibility to search/filter in those windows ... View more

In addition to the idea to group and filter environment variables the multi team approach should also be applied here with having access rights on (groups of) environment variables ... View more

Hello! I would love for Blue Prism to be able to remember the current size of the windows I open/close within the application, like the Application Modeller window. Throughout the day I end up opening and closing this a few times and each time I do so I have to re-size it, to see all the information within the window that I need properly. See attached screenshots for a better understanding. Best Regards, Robin Jensen ... View more

I understand that the process and object studio have numerous things to differentiate but what would be more usable is to have some different colors applied to Process and Object studio so anyone can understand in a glimpse that it is process studio and that was Object studio. I understand that most of the time it would be developers who would go to the studio to work on the code but many times we need to show the code to management/Non - technical folks it would be very nice to have there. ... View more

​It would be very useful to classify or to filter Environment Variables for example by processes because to handle lot of process and lot of Environment Variables very difficult. ... View more

Since we have multi team setup to control accessing other team's process/object. The same thing should apply to scheduler where a SCM scheduler can only manage/schedule SCM process and FIN scheduler can only manage/schedule FIN process to avoid potential SOD conflict. ... View more

The BP DB contains a lot of information that could useful for admin/BAU/audit/upgrade yet much of it cannot be extracted into a report. It would be nice to have a suite of reports made available. For example: Asset inventory All objects, pages, input/outputs, descriptions Top-down dependencies, ie what objects, queues etc each process uses Bottom-up dependencies, eg what is using each object, queues etc Credentials - expiry date, last used date, access rights etc Queue volumes Asset 'last used date' (eg what is obsolete) Activity reports Session history including termination reasons Change log per process/object/whatever Activity log per resource (which machines are used most and least) User reports Users, roles, permissions etc Activity per user Current user activity (who's logged in now, who's got control room open etc) System reports All BP client system settings (for comparing environments) Perhaps users could call stored procedures via Data Gateways instead of having to query tables directly. ... View more

We already have things like GetResourceName() but it would useful for a process/object to know other details such as: GetMyName() - eg what's this process called GetMyParentName() - eg which parent called this object GetMyPage() - eg what's the name of this page GetMyParentPage() - eg what's the name of the page from which this object was called Yes things can be hard coded but it's too hard to keep everything accurate. ... View more

When creating a new process or object, make the default behaviour be that the user selects a template. This will promote Best Practice, a 'house' style and discourage 'one of a kind' developments. Granted this is already possible via Save As but encouraging the use of templates will bring many benefits to the delivery sequence. (Thanks to DD for the idea) ... View more

White building a test suite that will be used for validation and for regression testing , it will be useful after running this test suite to have a kind of code coverage (or Process stages coverage)  informations. This code coverage can provide us with statistics like: ·         % of items in the process we didn’t path through. (it will be a good coverage indicator) ·         A list of these Items so we can enrich our test and enhance our test coverage. ·         Number of times we passed in the same path or sequence, so we can optimize our test suite by reducing test without compromising quality. ·         Object and objects ’actions called during these tests. ·         Credentials not used, Queues not used, … ·         …. This code coverage will also help identifying in production what objects are no more used and which paths in the processes we never go through in production. ... View more

​The first page of the discovery tool asks for the reason for automation, and one of the options is 'risk'. This then doesn't appear to be considered anywhere else within the tool or within the prioritisation matrix. Is there a way we can add these in somewhere to add weight to the prioritisation if the process is being automated on the basis of risk reduction rather than concentrating on FTE saving alone? Thanks ... View more

​Where a number of similar processes are raised for the same area, these all need to be keyed in individually - so we need to keep track of what prefix is being used and what answers were given to each question (so that they can be modified accordingly and in proportion to other processes). Would is be possible to add a 'Create copy' button to existing items? Thanks​ ... View more

If we get the name of the exe or process when we spy the element it will be useful for developers.  For Example, if i am working on SAP application and i have to save as a document into PDF, here save as dialogue should be attached with different business object, it is tough to find what is the process name of the save as dialogue. So if we have a attribute or information while spying that what is the process name blueprism is trying to spy it will be very useful for the developers. ... View more

Provide an automatic refactoring update to any renamed data item. Although renaming should not be done willy-nilly, it is a common task during development.  As your process grows it can become burdensome to manually have to find references and rename each occurrence of data item.  If a rename could be detected, prompt offered to confirm with list of potential updates, that would be very helpful. potentially useful and core capability for other renaming/adjustment tasks such as renaming components, page references, etc. ... View more

Although the code stage offers great ability to extend Blue Prism, the development experience is not good.   It would great to have some level of formal integration with Visual Studio, or other applicable IDEs, for a better development flow. Clicking on the the code tab in BP would launch Visual Studio and saving would bring code and libraries into BP.  Ability to fully test code in the IDE, even while debugging a VBO. stepping into a code stage would launch VS into active debug mode and then back out.  More transparency and visibility into missing libraries, global code issues, code validation errors would be great. ... View more

If we have a option to search for a process or object in Blueprism Studio. It will be very useful.  Also if there is any option to find a environment variable in the list that will be really useful ... View more

On the tool's INPUT: Human Worker Profile section it would be good if there was another of capturing the process costs. For example, for some of the processes we are automating we are charged per transaction as opposed to FTE based which is the only option on the tool.  It would also be good if you could export the process assessment results to Excel. We can extract some information but cannot see the further detail we have inputted in to the assessment (no of screens, no of paths etc) without clicking the edit icon to view the whole assessment again. Thanks James ... View more

As we can create groups for process, objects & queues. We should have option to create groups in scheduler as well. This will help in easy creation and maintenance of the scheduler. ... View more

If I create a schedule in Blue Prism, it shows as the name of the schedule with the scheduled processes underneath. When I click on a process, it allows me to set the next process that will run on that schedule after the currently selected process finishes. The trouble is that the processes can be arranged in any order under the name of the schedule, even if that order isn't representative of their running order. For instance, if I have a schedule called Count, and under that schedule are processes 1, 2, and 3 in numerical order. At first glance, you'd think that they'd run in that order. However, if you click on each individual process, 3 could run first, and then 1, then 2, all based on the contents of the On Complete combo box. I'd like to see the processes reorder themselves under the schedule name based on the On Complete contents. One step further would be to allow drag and drop functionality of the processes in a particular schedule to change their order, and have the On Complete contents automatically change based on that position. I think that if the drag and drop functionality were added, and that the order of the processes under the schedule name was the actual running order of the processes, the On Complete contents wouldn't even be needed, potentially freeing some real estate for something else. I would assume this would eliminate the need for the Initial Task combo box that is displayed on the screen that appears when you select the schedule's name. ------------------------------ Tracy Lovett RPA Developer I Synovus Columbus, Georgia, USA ------------------------------ ... View more